It's about the tenth anniversay of the World Trade Center destruction and here at the Clareywatch we're noticing that not a lot of people are willing to defend mass killers of innocents. But as we've said, Aaron's got a big heart full of sympathy for folks -- well, the right kind of folks -- that others pass over.
Now when Anders Behring Breivik blew up public buildings in Oslo and killed a few people, and then shot dozens and dozens of children dead in cold blood, well, you know the old
mainstream media was going to make that look bad. And lesser souls like Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, though usually happy to serve as professional bigots, rushed to distance themselves. Only one great soul, to our knowledge, was willing to embrace the poor, misunderstood Breivik and say, yeah, what he's saying is pretty close to what I've been saying. Yes, our own Aaron Clarey did, in one of his
most remarkable posts (
PDF). Everyone should read this beauty!
Right off, it takes the courage of an Aaron Clarey to realize: terrorism is something you can blame on the victim. Yeah, the mainstream media never tell you that! Furthermore, it takes Aaron to point out that the root cause of terrorism, is the pursuit of feminism. Who knew? But it takes a lot to pull the wool over Clarey: he's already shown us how letting women have control over their lives causes
rape,
AIDS, and even
big government.*
Aaron lets us know in the comments that it's just that kind of moral turpitude that
drove poor Breivik to take action, which of course is obvious and understandable:
I do believe, however, he has been driven to this by a general decay/destruction of traditional Norwegian culture and he could no longer tolerate to watch his country slide towards destruction and found this as his only means of action.
Sure! I mean, what else could the poor guy do? When I see some bitch who thinks she's not going to stay home and prepare the lingonberries and gravlax or stitch up a fine bunad for the girls to go sledding, well, it's a miracle I don't just grab a machete and head for the nearest junior-high-school. As Clarey tells us, "He still cares (perhaps too much and to a psychologically damaging level)." Perhaps! I mean, nothing says
I care like
I've just shot a lot of your children. And with these kinds of numbers, it's way cheaper than flowers, which don't work as well as that manifesto in explaining how we have to push back the Muslims and socialists.
What's also really helpful here is Aaron clarifies exactly what it is he's asking it to do:
It REALLY is only a hair of difference between what he's done and what I advocate with my "enjoy the decline."
Which is something we've been observing for years! REALLY just SO SO CLOSE to advocating racism-motivated terrorism! Sos it's great to have Aaron clear that all up, so we know what he stands for, or something very very close to it. Think those sissies like Geller would do that? No way, they backed away! Whereas Aaron knows that this is just one more golden opportunity for a little anti-Muslim bigotry as he tells us that you can take people's stuff, but killing people -- it's sometimes in quotes, you know, "killing" them, not killing them, 'cuz ya never know! -- is "too islamic
[sic] for me." Fortunately not for everyone though!
De gustibus and all that.
That's just the most helpful Clarey post of all time, I think; we really have some clarity on just what he's advocating. Thanks, Aaron!
Klarey's Klever Krew helps us get it, with a note that passes Clarey's rigorous approval process: "you know, this is STILL a terrorist attack caused in part by multi-culturalism." Well, of course! When you advocate tolerance and decency, and somebody -- somebody who just
cares so much -- is moved to kill a whole bunch of people because of that -- well, I don't know how you live with yourself, preaching tolerance like that.
*Although to be fair, San Francisco's Robert Miller, who abbreviates it "Nick," points out in the comments that blacks also cause big government, so it's maybe one of them multifactorial things.
